SpringChins
07-18-2005, 08:53 AM
I am probably going to be ripped apart for this, but I really feel that it is an issue that needs to be addressed. I have received a large number of chinchilla pedigrees at this point, and I must admit that I find them highly disappointing.
I am hoping (probably incorrectly) that this may be due simply to a lack of understanding. So I will try to shine a little light on the topic. :sunrise:
I think it may be useful here to review what pedigrees are used for in other species:
1. To show an animal is purebred.
2. Documentation of what individuals this animal is descended from, and who bred those animals. This helps to track health problems, as well as give some idea what quality might be expected.
The first application does not really apply, since there is only one breed of chinchilla. It can show you the presence of ebony in the lineage (which can lead to dirty-bellied kits), but that is about it.
As for the second one, a very large number of pet and hobby breeders are not using unique identifiers in their pedigrees. Instead, they are using "pet names". :(
A pedigree that uses pet names, and doesn't even specify where the animal came from or who bred it, is about as useful at tracking the lineage of an animal as a double-edged knife with no handle is at cutting a steak. IMO, these pedigrees are absolute garbage, not even worth the paper they are printed on.
You might argue "but they do it in dogs." However, dog names are registered and unique. Chinchilla names are only registered and unique if the breeder obtains a brand identification and uses the accepted naming conventions.
It should also be noted that most show dogs also have a "pet" name that isn't necessarily related to their registered name. They seem to get along fine with two names.
There is nothing about the accepted naming conventions that diminishes the value of the chinchilla as a pet. Carson doesn't know that he is also referred to as "QS R16" on his pedigree. All he knows is that he is loved, and that everyone calls him "Carson."
What should really cause chinchilla hobby and pet breeders to bow their heads in shame is the fact that rats have better pedigrees than chinchillas: rat pedigrees include the brand identification of the breeder for every single ancestor (SRR Chilly, Sire was RMA Boe, Dam was SRR Dot, etc). This means that a $20 animal (that's what you usually pay if they have a pedigree) has a better pedigree than something breeders expect their customers to spend $80 or more on. :eek:
IMHO, breeders should be obtaining a brand identification before the first kit is born, and should include the "official" names of all animals on the pedigree. It is up to them whether or not they also want to include the pet name.
Your thoughts? If you use "pet names" on your pedigrees, why? If you don't have a registered brand identification (costs $5), why?
Are you considering changing your practices after reading this? Why or why not?
~June~
I am hoping (probably incorrectly) that this may be due simply to a lack of understanding. So I will try to shine a little light on the topic. :sunrise:
I think it may be useful here to review what pedigrees are used for in other species:
1. To show an animal is purebred.
2. Documentation of what individuals this animal is descended from, and who bred those animals. This helps to track health problems, as well as give some idea what quality might be expected.
The first application does not really apply, since there is only one breed of chinchilla. It can show you the presence of ebony in the lineage (which can lead to dirty-bellied kits), but that is about it.
As for the second one, a very large number of pet and hobby breeders are not using unique identifiers in their pedigrees. Instead, they are using "pet names". :(
A pedigree that uses pet names, and doesn't even specify where the animal came from or who bred it, is about as useful at tracking the lineage of an animal as a double-edged knife with no handle is at cutting a steak. IMO, these pedigrees are absolute garbage, not even worth the paper they are printed on.
You might argue "but they do it in dogs." However, dog names are registered and unique. Chinchilla names are only registered and unique if the breeder obtains a brand identification and uses the accepted naming conventions.
It should also be noted that most show dogs also have a "pet" name that isn't necessarily related to their registered name. They seem to get along fine with two names.
There is nothing about the accepted naming conventions that diminishes the value of the chinchilla as a pet. Carson doesn't know that he is also referred to as "QS R16" on his pedigree. All he knows is that he is loved, and that everyone calls him "Carson."
What should really cause chinchilla hobby and pet breeders to bow their heads in shame is the fact that rats have better pedigrees than chinchillas: rat pedigrees include the brand identification of the breeder for every single ancestor (SRR Chilly, Sire was RMA Boe, Dam was SRR Dot, etc). This means that a $20 animal (that's what you usually pay if they have a pedigree) has a better pedigree than something breeders expect their customers to spend $80 or more on. :eek:
IMHO, breeders should be obtaining a brand identification before the first kit is born, and should include the "official" names of all animals on the pedigree. It is up to them whether or not they also want to include the pet name.
Your thoughts? If you use "pet names" on your pedigrees, why? If you don't have a registered brand identification (costs $5), why?
Are you considering changing your practices after reading this? Why or why not?
~June~